This Musing first appeared on our website on May 20, 2019. While the world has certainly changed since then, TOPGUN remains true to its core mission of providing graduate-level air combat tactics and training. In celebration of the long-awaited Top Gun sequel and Top Gun Month here at the FPP, the article is revisited with modest grammatical and style changes from the original three years ago.
The Navy Fighter Weapons School, “TOPGUN,” celebrated its 50th anniversary in May, 2019 and to commemorate the occasion, various festivities were held in San Diego not far from nearby Miramar where it all began. The four-day affair featuring numerous social events, a day of unclassified briefings, and a golf tournament (of course) was well attended by current and former TOPGUN staff. The culminating Saturday night banquet aboard the USS Midway Museum welcomed all NFWS graduates throughout the years and was quite an affair.
For me, the occasion proved a wonderful opportunity to catch up with old “bros,” as instructors are known regardless of gender or ethnicity, and the briefings provided deeper insight into the institution’s storied history including challenges faced by the current staff. Having retired from the Navy two years prior and a bit out of touch with the staff since, it was good to be back.
But throughout the weekend I found myself wondering what it was that allowed TOPGUN not merely to persist for a half century but to thrive. What are its keys to success? Why do young fleet pilots compete for the few coveted instructor slots, knowing if selected they will work harder than during any other assignment throughout their naval careers? And why do those same individuals later travel from points all over the globe to attend events such as this, greeting one another with bear hugs like long lost family members?
The reason is that TOPGUN is no ordinary institution. How the school was formed, the impact it has had—and continues to have—on Naval Aviation, and the people who go there to instruct all combine to make TOPGUN special, in the good way.
Consider this:
Forged in Fire
The NFWS was not the brainchild of some think tank or Ivy League collegiate study. It was not Congressionally directed or adapted from someone else’s “best practices.” TOPGUN came about because the Navy was getting its butt kicked in the skies over Southeast Asia.
Since the dawn of aerial combat a century ago, American forces have traditionally enjoyed a significant air-to-air kill advantage over its adversaries, routinely exceeding 10 enemy aircraft downed for every friendly fighter lost. But over Vietnam throughout the mid- to late-1960s, the combination of over-reliance on beyond-visual-range missiles, a lack of focus on aerial combat within the visual arena, and the premier U.S. fighter of the era (the F-4 Phantom II) being designed without a cannon—often the primary weapon employed in a close-in dogfight—all conspired against that advantage. Through early 1969 the kill ratio over Vietnam stood below 2:1.
To address this costly problem, the highest-ranking officer in the U.S. Navy, the Chief of Naval Operations, directed an investigation into how the maritime service fell into this predicament and—more importantly—the steps needed to get out. The resulting “Report of the Air-to-Air Missile System Capability Review,” commonly known as the Ault Report after its author, Captain Frank Ault, addressed holistic issues throughout the entire air combat system from the aircraft to the weapons systems to training and logistics.
But the most far-reaching recommendation of the report came under the “Aircrew Training” section. On page 37 of his report, Captain Ault advised the CNO to immediately establish an “advanced fighter weapons school” within the F-4 fleet replacement training squadron at Miramar. The CNO agreed and TOPGUN, as it would soon become known, was born.
These auspicious beginnings are not lost on the current TOPGUN staff five decades later. In a time when reliance on stealth seems to rule, training budgets are allocated to the fight of the past 25 years (i.e. supporting ground forces in irregular operations), and the F-35C Lightning II—the U.S. Navy’s premiere fighter—once again lacking an internal gun, TOPGUN is as relevant today as ever.
Indians, not Chiefs
The original TOPGUN cadre consisted of a handful of combat-experienced junior officers who were sufficiently seasoned to know what needed to get done and how to do it, but not so senior as to worry about protecting careers while doing so. The original bros “borrowed,” bartered, and otherwise negotiated to get whatever was needed to launch the new course, including a condemned trailer where classes were first held. Their methods are legendary and ensured the school’s success in early 1969.
TOPGUN has been run by fleet-experienced lieutenants and Marine Corps captains since. While methods may change, the original spirit remains and a certain level of creative license is routinely employed to get things done.
The Underdog
Despite support by the CNO, the early TOPGUN staff routinely lacked sufficient resources to fully execute the course. Fleet squadron commanders only reluctantly excused their best aircrews for the five-week syllabus and often rejected the teachings the graduates later brought back. Adversary aircraft were difficult to come by, training budgets were tight, the opportunity to develop tactics was rare, and resistance within the parochial fighter community persisted.
And yet, TOPGUN managed to not simply overcome these challenges but to create the gold standard for tactics that eventually spawned an entirely new way of implementing, funding, and tracking aerial tactics training throughout Naval Aviation. That system persists today.
Now based in the Nevada desert east of Reno as one department within a larger air warfare organization, the NFWS continues to battle for training dollars and resources. With limited budgets and few training assets on the flight line, this is sadly one aspect of the storied institution that has little changed. Fortunately, America loves an underdog, especially one that continually finds a way to win despite circumstances.
Apart from the continuous struggle for resources, another burden that unites all TOPGUN instructors is the onerous process of subject mastery.
Shared Burdens
The NFWS established itself as the authority on aerial tactics when its doors first opened. As such, instructors—then and now—spend hundreds of hours researching their assigned subjects learning theory, tactics, technical details, and every matter related to their topic. The result is they intimately understand the subject as well as they will ever know anything in their lifetimes. Possibly as well as they know themselves.
This expertise is then distilled into a lecture to eventually be presented to students. But before new bros stand in front of a class of students for the first time they must first survive the aptly-named ‘murderboard’ process.
At the NFWS, it is not enough to simply gather an extraordinary amount of knowledge on a given subject. To effectively instruct to the TOPGUN standard, bros must also remove all distractions from the presentation. Nothing is allowed to detract from learning: what instructors wear, how they stand, eye contact, voice control, hand gestures, speech, how pointers are used, how the digital presentation is advanced—every nuance is fair game and painstakingly critiqued. Only when the subject is truly mastered, and the presentation close to perfect, will a bro be permitted to instruct a class of students.
The result is truly a spectacle to behold. When I attended the course in early 2000, one of the Marine instructors provided his lecture to our class just one day after completing the murderboard process. His presentation was so flawless, so free of distractions, that I found myself distracted waiting for him to make a mistake. He never did. Today that old bro is a two-star major general in charge of an entire Marine Air Wing. Clearly, when you learn to master a subject, yourself, and flying, you create the conditions for success in just about anything else you’ll ever do.
The murderboard process changes you forever and creates a common bond with those who have similarly endured it.
Results Matter
The NFWS may not have lasted long had it not been for one simple fact: it worked. Within a year of turning out its first class, TOPGUN graduates took their newfound expertise back to their squadrons—and, more importantly, the skies over Vietnam—where the results spoke for themselves. The Navy’s A/A kill ratio immediately surged, surpassing historic levels, and the TOPGUN hangar back at Miramar soon became adorned with numerous silhouettes of downed enemy aircraft by its graduates. For their part, North Vietnamese pilots quickly learned to avoid skirmishes with the white Phantoms (Navy aircraft) and instead engage the olive drab ones (Air Force)—a fact not lost on the sibling service.
TOPGUN instructors and graduates have been at the forefront of every armed conflict in the half-century since, from operations off Libya to the Persian Gulf, Kosovo, Syria, and everywhere in between. It is no surprise that the Navy’s first downing of an enemy aircraft in over 20 years came at the hands of an old bro. The NFWS has made a measurable and indisputable difference in Naval Aviation’s lethality and effectiveness.
The Movie
There’s no question the 1986 Hollywood blockbuster Top Gun put Naval Aviation on the map. Recruiting offices were swamped after the film’s release and legend has it an enterprising Air Force recruiter once set up a table outside a movie theater to catch amped up moviegoers on their way out. And for good reason—who didn’t want to be the suave ‘Maverick’, feeling the need for speed, vanquishing the enemy, and getting the girl?
But beyond the masculine bravado, the movie accurately depicted Naval Aviation in its purest form: F-14 Tomcats mixing it up with A-4 Skyhawks and F-5 Tiger II’s over the Nevada desert and Pacific Ocean. Viewers experienced a fighter pilot’s highest highs and lowest lows, so commonly understood by those who live it for real. Top Gun is a feel-good story anyone can enjoy and despite having to pay a self-imposed $5 fine for quoting the movie, ask any TOPGUN instructor in private and he will surely tell you he’s seen the film dozens of times.
Time will tell whether Top Gun: Maverick will have a similar effect on a new generation of American youngsters but one can certainly hope.
I am exceedingly fortunate to count myself among the ranks of former TOPGUN instructors. I recall leaving Fallon in late 2002 following a two-and-a-half-year tour there with an immense sense of pride and accomplishment. The assignment unquestionably remains the high-water mark of my 25-year naval career and I have never given (nor regarded) a PowerPoint presentation quite the same since.
As I reflect on the camaraderie and shared bonds so evident at the 50th TOPGUN Anniversary celebration, I think I finally understand: the Navy, and the nation, needed TOPGUN in 1969. Back then we needed young men and women who knew how to get things done and were willing to do whatever it took to do it, regardless of the methods. We needed people who worked tirelessly to get the right answers and the right results. The Navy and our nation still need this today. In fact, perhaps more than ever.
Thank God for TOPGUN. May it last another 50+ years….
Comments